VPN in Focus aims to make privacy choices understandable. Articles should answer their main question early, separate documented claims from conclusions, and explain the limits that affect a reader’s decision.
Originality and attribution
Articles are original AI-assisted explanations prepared for this website. Linked primary sources support product statements and technical definitions. We do not reproduce third-party reviews, invent quotations, or present generated imagery as a real screenshot. Conceptual images are labeled accordingly.
Bylines and accountability
The site uses fictional contributor profiles to organize subjects. Their biographies describe coverage areas, not real qualifications, employment history, or test experience. These profiles are identified on their pages and article author cards. The publisher remains responsible for what appears on the site.
Evidence and commercial links
Research-based reviews are explicitly identified. Numerical test results require reproducible records. Affiliate links are commercial relationships, not supporting evidence. Product shortcomings and reasons to choose another option belong in the same review as strengths.
News and scheduled briefings
The news section includes evergreen weekly briefings written in advance. They are labeled as briefings, not reports of future events. Their publication date indicates when the article becomes available; preparation dates remain visible. A scheduled article should be revised if its underlying facts change.
Corrections
A substantive correction should explain the change and update the modification date. Old conclusions should not be silently preserved after evidence changes. Reports should identify the affected URL, the statement at issue, and a primary source supporting the correction.
No promises of complete protection
A VPN cannot make every online action private or safe. Content must explain relevant limitations, including account tracking, compromised devices, phishing, and the VPN provider’s own role.